|
Post by Lizardon on Nov 26, 2013 9:41:03 GMT
I don't like pokemon that are adaptations of inanimate objects... like Vanillite, Vanillish, and Vanilluxe, Klink, Klang, and Klinklang, Lampent, and Chandelure (I have to admit I quite like Litwick), Trubbish, and Garbodor, CoSpritzeerigus (Yamask is okay), Honeage, Doublade, and Aegislash, Klefki... I just think of pokemon as being creatures, not an every day item that's sprung to life. Not keen on those that hold stuff either. Never minded Farfetch'd so much but I think Gurdurr and Conkeldurr look ridiculous. Oh, and not to mention the collective pokemon... ie. Dugtrio, Magneton, Exeggcute. Pokémon = Pocket Monsters not Pocket Animals. And what's the problem with Magneton ? At least it makes sense 'cuz it's a magnet. I'm not saying that I like all of them, but there are awesome ones like Chanelure and Magnezone
|
|
Jirachi
Ace Trainer
Legendary
Hoping everyone is enjoying the forums!
Posts: 884
Friend Code: 3325-2256-6049
|
Post by Jirachi on Nov 26, 2013 9:47:11 GMT
I'm not keen on the idea of Pokemon that 'hold things' - like Farfetch'd with its leek or Gurdurr with it's girder but my least favourite Pokemon design is probably Crawdaunt - it's so gosh darn ugly, it looks like a sick operation on a Kingler gone wrong. Fun fact, it's believed Crawdaunts shell is actually supposed to Mimic Sharpedo, as to scare off potential predators. Also I love Crawdaunt! I don't think there is a design I do not like. A lot of Pokemon most don't like I can see the beauty in. Garbador looks bad Lickilicky, garbage monster is okay with me. Klefki is adorable I don't get how people cant like it.
|
|
Ben
Beginner Trainer
Posts: 98
Friend Code: 1349-5677-2404
|
Post by Ben on Nov 26, 2013 15:26:04 GMT
I don't like pokemon that are adaptations of inanimate objects... like Vanillite, Vanillish, and Vanilluxe, Klink, Klang, and Klinklang, Lampent, and Chandelure (I have to admit I quite like Litwick), Trubbish, and Garbodor, CoSpritzeerigus (Yamask is okay), Honeage, Doublade, and Aegislash, Klefki... I just think of pokemon as being creatures, not an every day item that's sprung to life. Not keen on those that hold stuff either. Never minded Farfetch'd so much but I think Gurdurr and Conkeldurr look ridiculous. Oh, and not to mention the collective pokemon... ie. Dugtrio, Magneton, Exeggcute. Pokémon = Pocket Monsters not Pocket Animals. And what's the problem with Magneton ? At least it makes sense 'cuz it's a magnet. I'm not saying that I like all of them, but there are awesome ones like Chanelure and Magnezone Merely expressing my opinion.
|
|
AFriendlyGuy
Junior Trainer
FC: 3110-4562-6732 If ya wanna do the Pokemans stuff :)
Posts: 226
|
Post by AFriendlyGuy on Nov 26, 2013 16:16:25 GMT
I'm not keen on the idea of Pokemon that 'hold things' - like Farfetch'd with its leek or Gurdurr with it's girder but my least favourite Pokemon design is probably Crawdaunt - it's so gosh darn ugly, it looks like a sick operation on a Kingler gone wrong. Fun fact, it's believed Crawdaunts shell is actually supposed to Mimic Sharpedo, as to scare off potential predators. Also I love Crawdaunt! I don't think there is a design I do not like. A lot of Pokemon most don't like I can see the beauty in. Garbador looks bad Lickilicky, garbage monster is okay with me. Klefki is adorable I don't get how people cant like it. I feel the same, I love all Pokemon. There may be certain flaws in them, but I still like those Pokemon :)
|
|
|
Post by ryannewton11 on Nov 26, 2013 18:03:04 GMT
I dont like many gen 5 or six pokemon... maybe its because the others were around when i was first playing pokemon but seriously...... they made a pokemon... thats a freaking set of keys!
|
|
obeyjagk
Junior Trainer
looking for shiny pumpkaboo
Posts: 173
Friend Code: 1306-6138-3517
|
Post by obeyjagk on Nov 28, 2013 13:29:23 GMT
1. Dunsparce. i can't stand dunsparce in any way 2. exeggcute and executor are just ridiculous. 3. Quiladin is just a little strange. 4. Diggersby is just stupid. it was cute as bunnelby and then what happened? 5. nosepass and probopass. who wants a pokemon with a giant nose as its main feature?
|
|
|
Post by Lizardon on Nov 29, 2013 17:24:32 GMT
Fun fact, it's believed Crawdaunts shell is actually supposed to Mimic Sharpedo, as to scare off potential predators. Also I love Crawdaunt! I don't think there is a design I do not like. A lot of Pokemon most don't like I can see the beauty in. Garbador looks bad Lickilicky, garbage monster is okay with me. Klefki is adorable I don't get how people cant like it. I feel the same, I love all Pokemon. There may be certain flaws in them, but I still like those Pokemon :) Yay, someone like me. I love all of the Pokémon, but some more or less.
|
|
ScarletStorms
Junior Trainer
I am now with a League my friends made up, I am a Dark Gym Leader and a Dragon Elite 4 Member >:D
Posts: 216
Friend Code: 4313-0718-5497
|
Post by ScarletStorms on Nov 30, 2013 17:08:10 GMT
I don't hate these Pokémon but I don't like their designs (PokéDex Order): 1. I don't think Clefairy is cute ... It looks pretty weird. Clefable doesn't have that derpy face and that's why Clefable is pretty cute 2. Drunk-looking weed thingy with a lot of drool sticking out of it's mouth lol 3. Six weird living eggs, one of them with a creepy smirk on it's face xD 4. That animation xD Licking obsessed thing that can make your shoes shine like heck xDD 5. and Koffing was looking like a troll face on a floating ball in Gen 1 and Weezing like a lung tumor LOL 6. I'm not afraid of mimes, but GEEZ THIS THING'S WEIRD 7. I get it! A weird artic creature of some sort that wants to give you a hug and a kiss ... just too awkward (Don't be racist!) 8. Looks like a punch bag that wants to punch you back and has a weird tail with 2 eyes on it 9. Is this thing supposed to be cute ? And why on earth are females more common when Granbull totally looks like a male ? 10. Stantler seems really simple ... 11. Okay, I got that Makuhita is a sort of sumo wrestler thing, but Hariyama's just too much 12. and I really really don't like those Pokémon's design. I really don't. 13. O_O 14. and ... 15. NOOO! I DON'T WANNA DIE, PLEASE! 16. (STUNKY STUNKY) and GROOSSSS! 17. Lookie-lookie what we have here! Not only that Lickitung was weird enough, but his evo is lickier than ever. 18. BIG DOGGY'S GONNA EAT ME! This thing is freaking scary and weird ... 19. and That girl from Gen 1 created this! WHYYYYY ? 20. The heck ? 21. I got over the fact of the trash bag Pokémon Trubbish ... BUT THIS THING IS FREAKING SCARY 22. <o_o> 23. This is a Foongus ? 24. Sorry, I don't like Bisharp ... 25. Heatmor's gonna eat more! That's kinda it lol Lickilicky is literally the WiFi Pokemon. I agree withe Medicham and Meditite they just ... why were they created.
|
|
ScarletStorms
Junior Trainer
I am now with a League my friends made up, I am a Dark Gym Leader and a Dragon Elite 4 Member >:D
Posts: 216
Friend Code: 4313-0718-5497
|
Post by ScarletStorms on Nov 30, 2013 17:14:21 GMT
1. Dunsparce. i can't stand dunsparce in any way 2. exeggcute and executor are just ridiculous. 3. Quiladin is just a little strange. 4. Diggersby is just stupid. it was cute as bunnelby and then what happened? 5. nosepass and probopass. who wants a pokemon with a giant nose as its main feature? Quilladins face looks like thomas the train --->
|
|
|
Post by Leader on Nov 30, 2013 19:27:56 GMT
Klin-Klang for me.
I don't really hate the designs of that many Pokémon, if I can think if more I'll add it to the list.
|
|
|
Post by Jay on Nov 30, 2013 19:38:30 GMT
update: I also dislike the designs of Sawk and Throh :/ theyre too human looking. It's creepy.
|
|
|
Post by Lizardon on Dec 1, 2013 10:37:28 GMT
Lickilicky is literally the WiFi Pokemon. I agree withe Medicham and Meditite they just ... why were they created. Because it's bulky, Return and Power Whip ? As I said I don't hate any of them, I just don't like the designs
|
|
Superman
Designer
Posts: 38
Friend Code: 4270-1809-2811
|
Post by Superman on Dec 9, 2013 2:29:24 GMT
All the starters from gen 4 onwards. I should be excited to get my starter and i only ever really was in the first two gens. All the pokemon that look like real world objects such as the ice cream pokemon what ever its Shinxy name is, and lots of the later legendaries as mentioned. You should be wanting them not wanting to send them back into the wild.
|
|
|
Post by E.T. on Dec 16, 2013 4:01:08 GMT
Despite the many variations in its design, I don't really like Unown. Several of the baby Pokemon such as Igglybuff seem kind of useless to me. Seel seems to be a bit too generic.
|
|